Drake’s Guards ‘Kicked’ Subpoena In XXXTentacion Murder Trial
Drake’s guards confronted process servers and “kicked” a subpoena who were attempting to summon the rapper to court in the XXXTentacion murder trial, a defense attorney Mauricio Padilla has claimed. According to the Miami Herald, Padilla, who represents Dedrick Williams, one of the three men accused of murdering XXXTentacion, issued a motion last week requiring Drake to deliver a deposition.
Court documents were uploaded to Twitter by Los Angeles Magazine legal reporter, Meghann Cuniff. In the documents, Padilla described the attempt to deliver a subpoena to Drake’s California home on Valentine’s Day (Feb. 14).
.@Drake's lawyer says Dedrick Williams' defense in XXXTentacion's murder trial only filed the new motion about Drake's deposition "to inject celebrity spectacle into an otherwise routine trial and generate headlines in the news." pic.twitter.com/IzPSDsDXzd
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) February 21, 2023
According to the legal documents, the armed guards allegedly sent the servers away and “kicked” the subpoena down the driveway.
“The process server was met by armed guards who refused to accept service,” Padilla wrote in the document shared by Cuniff. “The armed guards closed the colossal gate in the process server’s face.
“After having the gate shut in his face, the process server posted the subpoena, only to have one of Mr. Graham’s security staff literally kick the subpoena down the long driveway.”
Padilla added: “Apparently, Drake’s staff believes that physically kicking the subpoena is a legally sound way of refusing service.”
After one final attempt to serve Graham, one of the process servers said, “By the way, I like Drake.” To which the guard replied, “I am not accepting anything.”
According to Rolling Stone, last week Drake’s lawyers first tried to dismiss the subpoena effort. However, the judge ruled that Drake would still have participate which was set for Feb. 24.
This follows Drake’s lawyers filing a motion on Sunday (Feb. 12) to request for the rapper to not sit for the deposition. “It is both unreasonable and oppressive to subpoena an out-of-state party who has not been mentioned in any reports, any investigation, or referenced to have any involvement in this matter,” Drake’s attorney Bradford M. Cohen wrote in the filing, per Billboard. “To mandate that he appear for deposition for something that he very clearly has no relevant knowledge of is unreasonable.”